The only option

there are ideas, options, creative suggestions, proposals, guidances, that only exist at crossroads of specific place or point in time

exploring the unnatural options and means of executing when it comes to an idea, is this a contradiction to nature? or the wrong move?

in response to maddy’s “3rd movement” , the clear radical middle is exposed, of performance and written expression alluding to personal discovery and movements embodying the surefire and necessary avenues that landscapes can speak

“holding on to the idea and semblence of performance admist meeting the unplanned….”
what a question that speaks to viewing life as a performance, or the exact opposite of such…

“writngs and these mixtures of form allow for such IMMEDIATE breadth that other way may not be able to allude to…”
…jumping straight into the stories, ideas, and bodies of reflection (in this case telling of the natural connections and fricrions between environment and human)…. maybe this is possible in play writing and performance, maybe not….

—

I hate responding to things verbally when i am cold, when i have not spoken before in that day, knowing a flow of unfiltered text can act just genuine as words, this is a free-flow. is this autism? is this adhd? is this an inability to vocalize myself?

—

how to act? all work and emerging personal work seem to be answering or responding to this question in various forms. is there a need to embrace the opposite in personal exploration? some say no answer is an answer in itself, but choosing to not act, giving (referencing above) a comprehensive understanding or telling of natural ways TO act, but not taking upon any… why would this option to approach the question “how to act” exist? why would any option in answering how to act exist?